In
Reflection – Seeing Beyond Barriers to Possibility: Part
II
Dear Colleagues and Friends,
Typically I will
use every other month to reflect on the key article
written the month prior, responding to questions and
comments from readers on the previous issue. I recently
strayed from my normal format by writing back to back
articles on “Seeing Beyond Barriers to a Person’s
Possibility”, and hence, have received some great
questions and comments from both articles. In the
spirit of keeping these articles to a reasonable length,
I used last month and this month as follow-up issues in
order to field as many of the questions as I can. For
those who haven’t read them, you might want to go back
and read the original articles from
April and
June which prompted these queries.
Are we “playing with fire” or “working with fire” -
Revisited
The reader I am
replying to in this issue wrote in response to the
following question and answer published in last month’s
issue. Because it is brief, I thought we might revisit
the original text to which this month's reader is
responding.
|
Dear Denise,
While I respect your ingenuity and creativity
for uncovering a person’s gifts, dreams,
purposes, etc., aren’t you playing with fire
since we need to get people on board with what
is open and available in the job market? Thanks
for your input.
- Job Developer,
Jacksonville, Florida
While I
appreciate the question, I beg to differ with
the premise that our job is to get people “on
board” a ship that might not be headed in the
direction in which they intend to travel! To
begin with, how can we assume that we can even
begin to know all that is “available” in terms
of a person’s opportunities? The truth is that
what we have exposure to and knowledge of may be
an infinitesimal amount of what actually exists
in the world in terms of a person’s
possibilities. More importantly, focusing on
what is “available” automatically limits our
thinking to what is obvious and/or easily
accessible rather than expanding our ideas to
might be possible!
By
focusing solely on available openings we may
miss out on all of the potential opportunities
that could be created within a business by
looking at innovative ways of using a person’s
abilities to bring profit, save money, or solve
a problem for the employer be proposing a “new
position”.
Furthermore, what happened to the person’s
freedom to negotiate an existing position in
such a way that fits with their needs and
interests and still meets the needs of the
business? We need not necessarily limit a
person’s opportunities to what is immediately
available, but stay open and attentive to
additional possibilities. With a little
initiative and imagination we can propose and
create new opportunities that suit the needs and
interests of both the potential employee and the
employer. I think that what could be perceived
as “playing with fire” from one perspective
could be seen as “lighting a fire” from another
– namely, the kind of fire that can help
illuminate a path worth working hard to find and
follow with heart!
|
Reader Response:
Denise, your response to this question in the July
newsletter was off base. Your belief that ignoring the
job market-especially in our current economy, is rather
foolish. Are you saying that EVERYONE should pursue
their dreams, and ultimately they will reach their
vocational goals, regardless of external factors? I
would love to do something more creative, and more
fulfilling, however doing so would mean losing a
significant portion of my income. Not all dreams are
made to be met by vocation. Whatever happened to
pursuing your joys as a hobby or volunteer position? I
doubt your local garbage man aspired to do that work,
however we live in a society where we need money to pay
for essentials-not all of our talents, dreams, and
desires will lead to a job or career that can sustain us
- nor should they. What is wrong with a job for the
sake of having work? What you say sounds good on paper,
but a little dose of realism will go a long way. Why
should an employer go out of their way to "carve” a
position when there are 100 unemployed people out there
willing to take the job without conditions? Ignorance
of economic factors and what the job market can support
does not help those to whom you preach your "follow your
dreams philosophy", unless they are prepared to be
unemployed for quite a while. Why does society have
"regular" jobs at all then? Some conformity is
necessary and always has been-That's Life! Not all ball
players will make it to the major leagues, no matter how
bad they may want it or dream of it.
First of all, I
would like to thank this reader for so openly and
passionately countering my suggestions. Obviously this
is something the reader has thought a lot about, feels
deeply about, and has struggled with in helping people
find work, as well as in his own livelihood. I have
chosen to respond to this letter because I think it may
reflect the mindset of many professionals in our field
and I believe that it is a viewpoint that deserves
careful and deliberate consideration. Because there are
different questions embedded within this response, I
have taken the liberty of separating them into what I
see as distinct and independent issues.
Treating job
market information as a window or a wall?
To begin with, I
would agree with the reader that it would indeed be
foolish to ignore the job market or turn a blind eye to
real economic factors at work in one’s local economy.
Where we disagree is in the distinction between
“ignoring” the current job market and “completely
limiting” oneself to what one perceives there. To me,
taking into account what local employers say they need
and want is just good, basic job development, and as
such, I put a lot of attention in my book and in my
training on “quality employer assessment”. Knowing what
they are asking for, however, is just the springboard
for further inquiry. Rather than treat job market
information as a wall that we run up against, it should
be treated as a window that we open, look out from, and
lean into for further exploration.
There is a huge
difference between simply responding to job orders that
employers send our way and actually entering a dialogue
with employers about how best to meet their needs.
Helping the employer to uncover the essentials behind a
job description and its requisite qualifications is, in
part, what sets true job development apart from job
placement. To me, simply taking job market data at face
value without scratching below the surface is to operate
as “order-takers” in a field that entreats us to perform
more as vocational consultants. Job market information
is readily available to job seekers via the internet and
a whole host of services and agencies. I think what
individuals need from us is to go a step beyond that so
they might have an advantage over the vast number of
applicants competing for the same advertised openings in
the open job market.
Why would an
employer carve a position for someone when there are a
hundred other applicants who would take the job “as is”?
The employer’s
most basic and urgent need is to recruit the best person
for the job, the person with whom there is the greatest
chance of productivity, job satisfaction, and job
retention. Where do you think you are more likely to
find reap these benefits – from someone with whom you
have molded and shaped the job to fit their needs,
abilities and interests, or from someone in a long
line-up of applicants who is willing to take any job in
order to meet next month’s rent?
Ask any employer,
the time it takes to carve or accommodate a position for
the right person who will stay on the job is more than
justified when compared to the incredibly high cost of
having to recruit and then replace the employee who took
mistakenly accepted the job “as is”. Plus, when the
time and attention has been invested to develop a
position that works for both the employee and the
employer, a partnership has been made and a path has
been forged where future opportunities may be developed.
Does this approach require more effort and tenacity on
the part of the job developer or the job seeker in order
to enter that kind of relationship with the employer?
You bet it does! But as we know so well from
experience, as we sow, so we reap.
Is conformity
necessary?
With regard to
this part of the reader’s line of questioning, well, I
could write a treatise in response. Instead, I will
simply say that just because McDonald’s and Wal-Mart
enjoy enormous consumer success, doesn’t mean that I
have to partake in the fast-food culture or cease to
patronize the local shopkeepers. I don’t need to argue
my taste or take fault with those in the mainstream, but
I can make a different choice. I would not argue with
job seekers who restrict their search to available
openings, in fact, I think its’ important to consider
all possibilities, including those in the open job
market. The question I pose is, “Why would you stop
there when there are additional ways of expanding your
opportunities?” My first fifteen years in the work
world were spent in positions that I applied for in the
mainstream job market. It worked for me just as it has
worked for millions. Once I discovered alternative ways
of viewing employment, however, I never went back to
traditional methods. What I am positing is not an
“either/or proposition” – be creative or be traditional
in your job search, but a “both/and approach” – look at
your options in the available job market, and consider
exploring additional possibilities to create, shape, and
expand your opportunities.
Should
everyone be encouraged to follow their dreams?
Finally, I would
like to speak to the reader’s question about whether or
not I would have everyone follow their dreams,
regardless of, or in spite of, external factors which
would require someone to take work for other purposes.
I wholeheartedly agree with the reader that not all
dreams need to be met through our vocation, and in fact,
I would assert that we all have dreams and desires that
may only be met outside of work. (e.g., I love to cook
and I love to garden but the thought of doing either for
money would take much of the joy out it for me.)
However, when a
person has a dream, a purpose, or a passion which can be
incorporated into a work opportunity, I would
wholeheartedly urge that person to follow the pull of
that desire with everything they’ve got! Not only do I
disagree with the idea that following a dream will
translate into “a longer term of unemployment”, I would
contest that it could drastically shorten their job
search for the following reasons:
-
People who
know what they want and what they are looking for
have the advantage of carrying out a much more
deliberate and focused job search. Their sights are
set in such a way that they are not easily
distracted or sidetracked from the goal.
-
When people
are on a quest for something that has meaning and
import beyond a paycheck, they are more likely to
have greater energy, stamina, and perseverance in
their job search. They don’t give up easily because
they are determined not to “settle” and they bring
the power of commitment.
-
People who
are following a larger dream, desire or purpose have
an edge in the interview over those who are simply
applying for the job because they need work –
employers can feel the difference!
(Obviously there
are numerous additional benefits to following one’s
dreams and desires when it comes to job satisfaction,
job retention, and ongoing career development, but such
a listing would be deserving of its own issue!)
Aren’t there
other reasons to work other than passion?
I have long
taught that there are many varied motives for working,
each of which can be quite profound and powerful,
depending on the circumstances of the person in
question. (For a full discussion on this topic, please
go to the archived issue of this newsletter from March,
2006 entitled “Nine Essential Work Motives”.) Among
those nine motives I write about a sense of purpose, a
sense of security, a sense of belonging and affiliation,
a sense of achievement and accomplishment, the joy of
using one’s skills, the desire to increase one’s
competence, etc. What inspires a person to take and
stay on a job is always multi-faceted and multi-layered
and I question the reader’s assumption that the local
garbage man did not necessarily choose to do what he is
doing.
How often have we
seen that from one person’s perspective what may appear
a most dismal or thankless job, will from another’s
point of view be experienced as rich with rewards?
That is one of the extraordinary aspects of the
vocational journey, the fact that it is so
multi-dimensional, always experienced in ways particular
and distinctive to the person depending on their
temperament, their personality, their needs, desires and
values, etc., and all within the context of their larger
life circumstances. No wonder we can never wholly
understand another person’s relationship to their work
any more than we can fully comprehend another person’s
relationship to his/her mother, spouse, or next door
neighbor.
I think it
behooves us to perceive the value and meaning of work in
the long-term rather than the short term. I consciously
employ the term “true livelihood” in my teaching and
writing for two reasons. First, it invokes both the
notions of being true to oneself and one’s sense of
purpose, gifts and values; and secondly, the term
livelihood is rooted in the word “life”, invoking a
sense of the ongoing journey of life and work. Inherent
in any journey is its inevitable path of twists and
turns, those welcome and rewarding, as well as those
that are difficult and trying. Viewed from this
perspective, there are no mistakes and no time is ever
wasted in a work opportunity as every experience adds to
one’s personal accumulation of wisdom, experience,
preferences, skills, network, etc. What is important is
the conscious awareness on the part of the worker of the
goals and intentions motivating the circumstance they
are in, and bringing the best of what they have to each
and every opportunity.
Wishes for the
disgruntled employment counselor
The reader states
in his letter that he would love to do something more
creative or fulfilling but would have to take a cut in
pay in order to do so. (Oddly, most of the employment
professionals I have met in the field express the
opposite angst – they love the work, but wish they could
make more money!) Still, to the many people in our
profession who feel less than inspired in their work and
hold a similar view to the one expressed by the reader,
I hold out the following hopes and wishes:
-
That you
consider what it is costing you in other areas of
your life by staying in a job largely for financial
purposes. While not ignoring or diminishing our
economic needs, there is a high price to be paid by
ignoring the need to live out one’s deepest purposes
and to express one’s finest gifts. As the reader
pointed out, it is not that one’s purposes, dreams
and gifts cannot be satisfied in other areas of
one’s life outside of work. In that case, may you
be blessed with the imagination and fortitude to
find many wonderful ways of being true to the dreams
and desires that inspire you.
-
That you
might be open to the possibility that there is work
in which you could be more creative and find more
fulfilling which would not necessitate a cut in
pay. If you cease believing that such an
opportunity is possible, you may cease to look for
it, and thus, never find it. Be careful not to
interpret as a “reality” something that, in fact,
may be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
-
Difficult as
it might be, may you hold to the belief that the
individuals you serve can follow and achieve their
vocational dreams, albeit by a circuitous route,
even if you have not yet arrived at the place in
your own livelihood.
We are all in
this together – this livelihood thing – and we need the
light from each other’s lamps to illumine the way when
we feel lost. And even when we begin to lose hope for
ourselves, or settle for less than what our heart
desires, we need to dig deep down and extract hope for
those around us. As Ralph Waldo Emerson observed, (and
I am paraphrasing) - how strange and lovely a thing it
is that when one helps one’s brother’s boat ashore, he
too will have reached land.
Until next month,
~ Denise
© Denise Bissonnette, August 2008
(If not used for commercial purposes, this article
may be reproduced, all or in part, providing it is credited to
"Denise Bissonnette, Diversity World - www.diversityworld.com." If included
in a newsletter or other publication, we would
appreciate receiving a copy.)
Read Denise's
previous (July 2008) newsletter...
We welcome your comments
and feedback on this article!
Please consider
sending us your opinions, perspectives, experiences or
related resources on this topic. Unless you specify
otherwise, your comments and contact information may be
edited/published in a future edition of the True
Livelihood Newsletter.
Email your
comments on this article...
TLN@diversityworld.com
|